Contraview Research
What really predicts biotech success
Every signal is tested against what happened next, using only what was known at the time.
Selected signals
Outcomes within 36 months · private company-years and 9,313 Phase 2 programmes
Specialist biotech fund on the cap table
2.0xAny exit95% CI 1.8 to 2.3 · p <0.001 · Single variable
Two or more specialist funds
2.9xTakeout of $100M+95% CI 2.1 to 3.9 · p <0.001 · Single variable
Pharma investor on the cap table
2.2xTakeout of $100M+95% CI 1.5 to 3.0 · p <0.001 · Single variable
Trial stopped in the prior 3 years
0.37xAny acquisition95% CI 0.16 to 0.61 · p 0.004 · Single variable
12+ rivals entered Phase 2 on its target in the last 3 years
0.54xAny acquisition95% CI 0.24 to 0.96 · p 0.04 · Single variable
A rival drug on the same target is already in the clinic for the same disease
2.4xPhase 2 to Phase 395% CI 1.9 to 2.9 · p <0.001 · Full model
Risk ratios against companies or programmes without the signal, adjusted for year and data depth. Single variable: the signal on its own. Full model: the signal held against our controls, such as sponsor size, the disease's base rate and human genetics. Intervals from clustered bootstraps or clustered errors. Associations, not causes. These are a few of the variables our models in development combine, dozens at a time.
Every variable is audited
1,396 variables tested · 62% pass
Leak: the variable encodes the outcome or was recorded after it. Circular: it is built from the outcome. Model output: another model's score, not a measurement.
Contraview Research
Get in touch